If one considers the legendary tale, the initial victim of a historic torture instrument that roasted prisoners alive might have been the creator itself. The “brazen bull,” believed to have originated in ancient Greece, was an intricately designed yet needlessly cruel device. Constructed as a large hollow bronze statue resembling a bull with a lockable door, the victim would be confined inside. Subsequently, the contraption would be placed over a fire, causing the enclosed individual to feel the walls gradually and inevitably heating up.
As the temperature of the apparatus rose, the screams of the captive would resonate through a series of pipes, emanating from the bull’s mouth and nostrils now emitting steam. The agonizing cries were said to resemble the sound of a cow.
Likewise, Chris Pratt’s film “Mercy,” released today, might leave viewers groaning in discomfort. The experience of watching this movie, often described as “Minority Report for babies,” is not just about witnessing occasional torture but more about enduring a mundane storyline that fails to capture the essence of an ancient execution narrative.
“Mercey” serves as a cautionary tale about our near future. The story unfolds in August 2029, with Detective Chris Raven, portrayed by Pratt, awakening to the informative tones of a commercial promoting the “Mercy Court.” This court, which he helped establish, focuses solely on capital punishment and is presided over by an impartial AI judge. Instituted to address a surge in crime leading to criminal-dominated “red zones” in major cities, the court’s merciless efficiency reflects a stark cultural commentary.
However, Chris finds himself entangled in his own trial after his wife’s tragic death, with overwhelming evidence pointing towards him as the prime suspect. Like many before him, he faces a lethal sonic pulse device set to activate in 90 minutes unless he can prove his innocence to the AI judge, Judge Maddox, with less than a 92% chance of guilt.
Despite a promising premise, “Mercy” falls short on execution. While attempting to reflect on societal issues, the film lacks depth and fails to deliver a meaningful message. The narrative, akin to the brazen bull story, revolves around the ironic fate of a once indifferent individual now facing the consequences of his actions.
However, “Mercy” veers off course by focusing more on artificial intelligence rather than exploring the human aspect of justice and redemption. This shift in theme detracts from the film’s potential impact, turning it into a misguided promotion of AI technology rather than a thought-provoking reflection on morality and justice.
In the end, “Mercy” comes across as a missed opportunity, failing to engage with its intended themes effectively. The film’s misguided portrayal of AI and justice serves as a cautionary tale of its own, reminiscent of the inventor of the brazen bull trapping himself in his own creation.